| The "Silver Bullet Technique" |
The "silver bullet" technique involves a carefully contrived, and set up false accusation of Domestic abuse, or, when possible, the provocation of real incident of Domestic abuse. Those who perpetrate this scam will make the charge of Domestic abuse, no matter what their victim does, or fails to do.
In many cases they close joint bank accounts, and make doctors appointments, BEFORE they create the "incident".
It happens hundreds of times every day.
This technique is being taught by political activists, who pose as victim's advocates. It is a means of gaining advantage, in any confrontation- particularly divorce. It gives the complaining party (referred to as the "victim"), immediate exclusive custody to the house, to the contents of the house, and to the children. It gives the REAL VICTIM (referred to as the "Defendant") the responsibility for all of the bills, while he is trying to deal with suddenly becoming homeless.
The perpetrators call themselves "victims".
The REAL victims generally do not have a clue what was done to them.
Over and over we see the following interesting phenomenon:
1. A marriage has existed for decades. There was never a call to 911, never a policeman in the house, never a complaint to family court, never a complaint to the Department of Social Services, never a time when the wife left the house "to avoid abuse".
2. The wife goes to see a divorce attorney, for reasons known only to herself.
3. Within a few weeks there is a call to 911, police in the house, a complaint to family court, a complaint to the Department of Social Services. On the night of the alleged abuse the wife leaves the house "to avoid abuse". The next day she has her husband thrown out of the house by the court.
4. OF COURSE, the divorce attorney claims no involvement in creating such a strange change in the pattern of this marriage.
The first step is usually a complaint for relief from "domestic abuse". This is filed in Family Court Relief from "domestic abuse" is a civil action for restraining orders.
"Separate the combatants" is the goal of the family court. There is very little consideration given to the question of who is to blame. The more important consideration is the question of which "combatant" is best able to deal with suddenly becoming homeless.
It does not take too long to figure out that it is usually the man, who suddenly becomes homeless.
Women generally know this, when they complain.
This is not a game for tramps only. If the most exalted love of your life ever becomes "a woman scorned", you could STILL SEE THIS HAPPEN. Most of these "women scorned" scenarios involve WIVES.
The "silver bullet" technique is a system of stripping you of your property, your right to own a gun, and your freedom. It can put you out of you own home, with no access to your own money, your children, or your possessions. It can cause you unlimited legal expenses. It can turn your friends and family against you.
The "silver bullet" technique is being implemented by a well organized net work of lawyers, paralegals, advocacy groups, radical women's groups, prosecutors, doctors, police, and even judges.
The "silver bullet" technique replaces the family unit with the power of government.
The "silver bullet" technique neutralizes political activists.
If you do not understand it, you are in grave danger.
It is a very old axiom that "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned." No matter how well this principle is known, it is apparently not well understood by many prosecutors.
There is now a movement to demand a mandatory "NO DROP" policy for cases involving false domestic violence.
Local Solicitors know how to recognize malicious prosecution, retaliatory cross complaints, self defense, abuse of process, simple con games, mental instability, and ulterior motives.
Local Solicitors are now being stripped of the ability to use common sense in handling Criminal Domestic Violence allegations.
OF COURSE, this takes resources away from protecting the women, who really DO need protection.
OF COURSE, there really are women who need protection. No usurpation of power would be possible if it did not proceed on the basis of solving a REAL PROBLEM.
Many of the REAL victims of domestic abuse are so afraid, that they never call the police. The only ones, who call the police, are those who are not afraid to do so. Police know that much of the abuse goes unreported. They compensate for this, by more zealously prosecuting those who are falsely accused.
SEE: http://www.dvmen.org/dv-12.htm#pgfId-1000593
AND: http://www.dvmen.org/dv-13.htm#restraint
"Allegations of family violence are the weapon of choice in divorce strategies. Lawyers, and paralegals in women's shelters, call them the "Silver Bullet." False abuse allegations unquestionably work very effectively in removing men from their homes and families. "
http://www.dvmen.org/dv-17.htm#pgfId-1000404
=======================
Your 'lucky' night
Take the following scenario that might happen on any summer weekend as you are out cruising the local scene. This hypothetical situation is perfectly reasonable under current laws (This was written in Colorado, but most states have similar laws).
While it is unknown whether this exact situation has occurred, variants of it have.
====================She was all over you almost as soon as you walked in the bar. She couldn't keep her hands off you, and when you danced she got you so h*** you had to hide it on the way back to the table.
Naturally you take her to your house. A warm summer evening, the windows are open, and she is, shall we say, audible. This woman loves it! She is panting and moaning, yelling "Stop! Stop! I can't stand any more!" "Oh please don't do that!" as she grabs you and pulls you into her, and then climbs on top of you. You finally collapse from exhaustion planning on how you are going to brag to your buddy next door, who must have heard this.
She wakes you in the morning, screaming and tearing up the house. You grab her and try to control her. She is berserk. You are scratched up and she is looking the worse for wear. Neighbors call the police, or she does. Obviously 'domestic violence' when they get there. Arrest is mandatory C.R.S. § 18-6-803.6 and you are taken off in handcuffs. You protest you've never seen this woman before but it is obvious that you have been intimate with her C.R.S. § 14-4-101.
You make bond eventually and sign the mandatory restraining orders or you don't get out of jail. Maybe you don't notice that one of them says you will vacate the premises C.R.S. § 18-1-1001. Hell, you never saw her before last night, and you head back home. She is still there and starts screaming again as soon as she sees you.
More police!
You've violated the restraining order to vacate, harassed and intimidated her, and would obviously like to retaliate against her. You probably also shout at and threaten her. Three months later, when you get out of jail again, you are a little more cautious but she is still in your house. She has told the victim's assistance program that is where she is living. You have no options, the female district attorney assures you that you are an unspeakable beast, the judge is bound by the laws and judicial bias is a reality.
The rent is way past due. Best if you pay it or the landlord will take you to court!
You'd like a drink but consumption or possession of alcohol is prohibited. No guns, any other weapon, or explosives either or you will violate Federal law and be up on a felony charge. You are also ordered not to contact, or directly or indirectly communicate with the 'victim.'
Any minor infraction of these restraining orders and you get another reunion with all those great people down at the county jail. Unless you like tending the Sheriff's flower garden you obey the restraining orders. However, by court order, you are a street person, and have probably lost your job, so maybe the jail looks good to you during the winter months.
You will also be made to take domestic violence counseling run by rabid feminists where you are made to admit that you are a 'batterer' and swear to forsake the patriarchy forever. Before this started you probably hadn't even heard of the patriarchy but you are still inherently evil because you are male.
And all of this is supposed to reduce your tendency to violence?
Because you haven't learned your lesson, you plead innocent at the hearing. This is a free country, right? Justice will be done and within 6 months your case comes up for trial on 'fast track.' In Colorado Springs, defense attorneys refer to 'fast track' as a railroad.
How's the house looking now? Did her boyfriend move in with her? How does it feel when you make the house payment? Anything left of your possessions? Were they doing drugs, and when the police broke in, she blamed them on you? Does RICO now have a whole new meaning to you? Or maybe you live in Denver and they've taken your house under municipal ordinance 37-50, et seq . as a 'public nuisance' because of the loud parties she was having. 1
Well, likely she won't show up for the trial, and eventually you think you will get to go back home. But you end up convicted of domestic violence anyway after the cops testify what they saw when they arrived. Anything the neighbors may have heard or thought they saw is also admissible together with any other hearsay the prosecutor can dig up.
In San Diego, California, they found they got a higher conviction rate if the alleged 'victim' didn't testify. Boulder is now using the same approach with the same results. If, as you should, you carry the issue to trial, you must be sure and subpoena the 'victim.' Dismissal of the charges should be demanded if she fails to appear.
Conviction carries a lifetime sentence, no weapons, you are listed in a national database, the restraining orders are permanent , and you've earned the contempt of your neighbors. Every time a cop stops you the restraining order will come up.
When you do check out the house after the trial, she is still there. Please don't be so foolish as to go in, or anywhere near your house if she is.
If there is anything left of your life, home, job, savings, or children after having been accused of domestic violence, you will be hard pressed to recognize it.
Can't happen? You haven't looked at the domestic violence laws now on the books in many states, under the umbrella of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) passed by Congress in 1994.
====================
Other possibilities
Divorce games
Perhaps the above scenarios don't fit your circumstances? In your nightmare the wife wanted to keep the house, kids, and all your possessions as happened with Rikki's Dad in Minnesota or to Bob in Australia. It seems unlikely that she will get everything she wants in a simple divorce. Instead she dials 911, scratches herself up, maybe she has a bruise from a fall and goes to the hospital, or police station, with a story that her husband abused her. Maybe her new boyfriend roughed her up, or you threaten the guy like Dr. Emerson allegedly did.
In any case, the law requires that you be arrested, evicted from your home, and have no contact with her or your children. Mediation is rarely an option when domestic violence or abuse is charged and was forbidden prior to July, 1999. Months will go by before the case comes to trial. Meanwhile, you are on the street. All of this on the unsupported word of a woman seeking gain, revenge, playing games, or simply wanting to get rid of you.
If you have children in the home, and she has filed domestic violence charges against you, there is also a very high probability that she will, at some point, charge you with abuse of the children as well. Defending yourself against the domestic violence or abuse charges raises the probability of her charging you with abuse of the children. The process she is going through is known as the divorce-related malicious mother syndrome. It may help to look at that Web site to prepare you for what might be coming next.
You will need a lawyer!
The Reverend Dennis Austin has looked at the allegations of child-abuse under current laws and finds that:
"Before 1973, child abuse was rarely reported to authorities and often it was covered up. In 1963, reports of suspected child abuse was 160,000 but between 1976 and 1993, the total yearly number of child abuse reports grew from 669,000 to over 2.9 million after the child abuse protection legislation that Senator Mondale sponsored.
The passing of this legislation has also resulted in the increase of allegations of child abuse in divorce battles. In 1975, thirty five percent of all child abuse reports were unsubstantiated, but by 1993, that percentage sky-rocketed to sixty-six percent. In divorce, when allegations are made and the police conduct investigations, ninety seven percent of these claims are unable to be substantiated.
It is obvious that many allegations of abuse which are reported in divorce situations are false and ninety five percent of those accusers are women. With the high amount of divorces, the percentage of those divorces which abuse is reported, and the percentage of which are unsubstantiated, it shows that children are being used as pawns to hurt or destroy the other parent. These false allegations of abuse, even if proven to be false, can ruin someone's life and have a devastating effect on the children."
By the way, you also lose you right to keep and bear arms for LIFE.
How "the system" CREATES FALSE ACCUSATIONS:
Step One: The government enters your life:
Perhaps your children utter an idle word at school.
Perhaps one of your children gets into trouble.
Perhaps a medical professional, or counselor, makes a report.
(They are required, by law, to report suspicions of "abuse")
Perhaps your spouse complains. Your spouse may be encouraged to complain by a friend, relative, or a professional. At first, this might seem like a good way just to "get his attention".
Someone called 911. Many jurisdictions have a policy that "someone" has to be arrested on every domestic disturbance call.
Step Two: The pressure to escalate to CRIMINAL CHARGES:
Child Protective Services says that they will TAKE YOUR CHILDREN, if you do not act according to THEIR "suggestions".
"No one will take you seriously if you do not file an "incident report" with law enforcement."
The "incident report" starts a criminal investigation.
Some time later the person, who made the "incident report" is told to come and sign a warrant.
"We have done all of this work now. We EXPECT you to follow through".
"Were your original statements true, or did you commit perjury?"
The warrant is signed UNDER OATH.
Now they say that it WOULD BE perjury to try to back out.
If you try to back out they assume that you have been threatened.
Well NOW you have really "got his attention"!!!!
You also got a restraining order, that says that he cannot contact you.
Are you getting more attention now, or less?
Step Three: The "No Drop" policy.
Many jurisdictions have a policy that no domestic disturbance cases can be dropped,
NOT EVEN IF THE SO CALLED VICTIM ASKS THAT IT BE DROPPED.
The assumption will be that THE SO CALLED VICTIM has been threatened.
Yes, it CERTAINLY is PEOPLE, who make false accusations.
BUT the fact is; the system is structured like a row of dominoes.
Knocking the first one down does not always look like it is going to "run the whole course" as it generally DOES.
South Carolina Attorney General Charles M. Condon. ( Email: info@scattorneygeneral.org ) is demanding a mandatory NO DROP policy for cases involving domestic violence.