Answer from my November 7, 2009 Family Rights Examiner article-

There is a Communist bureaucracy out there ready to "do business" with you on the phoniest pretense.  It's called Children's Protective Services.  An anonymous caller is all it takes, and you are in the fight for your life.  The CPS agent sent into your life may call themselves an "investigator".  That agent is no such thing.  She is there to make the allegation stick to you, and any lie will do.  These people should have jobs making up slander for the tabloids.

Back to the title of this essay, "What rights does a cps worker have?".  

They have NO rights.  They work for the government.  Your Constitutional Rights are YOUR rights AGAINST government.  The Bill of Rights enumerate what the government CAN'T do to you. 

CPS agents have NO power.  They can't make you do anything.

But that CPS agent has a tool you might not know about- The Poison Pen.  The CPS agent writes up her Character Assassination on you and files it in court as an Affidavit.  It's "Gospel".  The "judge" isn't a real Judge, and his is NOT a Constitutional court of Due Process.  It's another Administrative Statute Law court. 

If you don't know what to do about it, you are toast.

See How to Fight CPS
The Mission-Critical Need-to-Know Info

Don't 'VOLUNTEER"-

"...because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many Citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights due to ignorance." US. v. Minker, 350 US 179, 187

In US. vs. Johnson, 76 F.Supp. 538, 540 (1947), Federal District Court Judge James Alger Fee ruled that- "The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor to the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto.  It is a FIGHTING clause.  It's benefits can be retained only by sustained COMBAT.  It cannot be claimed by attorney or solicitor.  It is valid only when insisted upon by a BELLIGERENT claimant in person." McAlister vs. Henkel, 201 U.S. 90, 26 S.Ct. 385, 50 L. Ed. 671; Commonwealth vs. Shaw, 4 Cush. 594, 50 Am.Dec. 813; Orum vs. State, 38 Ohio App. 171, 175 N.E. 876. "The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents rather than make a last ditch stand, simply loses the protection. . . . He must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus."  

So perhaps you should spend a good amount of time learning your most basic BILL OF RIGHTS and your MIRANDA RIGHT too.  This is American Civics, and they aren't teaching it in government school.  WHY?  See Alliance for the Separation of School & State